Quote:

---

Paul Dallas said:

Quote:

---

sptsman said:

Quote:

---

Mac said:Democracy ain't purty, and their replacement governments don't have control over anything there yet.

---

If you think this is "democracy", you are sadly mistaken. These are terroist organizations that our own President has helped put in power to try to appease the Middle East radicals that hate us. He succeeded in getting them into power, now he/we will see how well the whole appeasement thing works. So far, not so good.

Only the completely clueless, idot liberals think that you can appease these people and become friends with them. What is even more ironic is the very people on our side that hold the most firmly to the idea of appeasement are the people they hate the most. Ask them what they do to women that express thoughts, ideas and opinoins of their own. As them what they do to openly homosexual people. Ask them what they think of secualr humanists....

If you think this is some sort of Arab Spring democracy movement, I have some swampland to sell you... No, wait, I have a failed President you can vote for. He seems to be a delusional as the people that think these terrorists can be our friends...

---

Are you saying Qaddafi should've been left in power?

---

Where did you read that or even get the slightest implication, from what I posted? The issue is with who was backed by the USA, when the power grab began. Obama chose sides and picked the side that is now whacking Americans... How, in the world, does he not have to take some responsibility for this? Bush royally f'ed up by not having a clear plan after ousting Sadam in Iraq and after going into Afghanistan. Does that somehow escuse Obama for getting cozy with the terrorists that are now killing Americans?

--------------------
"Hunts are best measured by the endurance of the memories they produce..."

Post Extras